rayboy
1/. Canon 5D, 1080P 30 fps and Nikon 7000 1080P , 24 fps . Is the picture quality the same between the 30fps and 24 fps ??
2/. What is the rate for fps in movie standard today (30 or 24) ??
Many Thanks
Answer
1-The picture quality will be indistinguishable if you know how to work the camera right. HD TV is broadcast at 29.97fps unless its a sports program in which case the frame rate is usually 60p so the action will be smooth and undistorted.
2- The frame rate of a movie is dependent on the film maker. There is no industry standard rate. Some are shot in 24, 25, 30, or 60fps. But if you have a Blu-ray player, you might have noticed that 99% of the movies are at 24fps which is the rate of the old movie film.
1-The picture quality will be indistinguishable if you know how to work the camera right. HD TV is broadcast at 29.97fps unless its a sports program in which case the frame rate is usually 60p so the action will be smooth and undistorted.
2- The frame rate of a movie is dependent on the film maker. There is no industry standard rate. Some are shot in 24, 25, 30, or 60fps. But if you have a Blu-ray player, you might have noticed that 99% of the movies are at 24fps which is the rate of the old movie film.
Whats your take HDdvd or the Blueray....whats the diffrence really?
george o
arent they both supposed to be way better than the ordinary dvd players and movies or is one supirior compared to the other?
Answer
Yes, both are supposed to be better then regular DVD players, and in similar ways. There certainly are technical differences, but the main effective difference to the consumer is that, except for Warner Bros. studios, the major studios are lined up behind one or the other. So if you get HD-DVD, you'll find stuff from WB, Paramount, and NBC/Universal out in HD, and you'll need regular DVDs for other content. If you get Blu-Ray, you'll have Sony, Fox, Disney, etc. but you can't get Paramount or NBC/Universal.
Now, as for better, the "better" is very real. Both formats support full high definition discs (technically, 720/60p, 1080/60i, or 1080/24p), which looks dramatically better on you HDTV than DVD... not that DVDs look all that bad. Both formats support the existing MPEG-2 encoding used on DVDs, but also allow videos to be encoded in two modern compressed formats, MPEG-4 AVC (same format used on the iPod and satellite TV) and VC-1 (that's the standardized version of Windows Media Video 9). The quality on either format can be technically higher than broadcast HDTV, so these are currently about the best looking thing you can view on your HDTV.
They also offer improved sound, with multichannel uncompressed audio (DVDs only offer uncompressed stereo, and even that's rarely offered on DVDs), and surround up to 7.1 channels. Not that many people have 7.1 channel audio today, but these are pretty forward-looking.
The other feature in both is "interactivity"... you can play simple games, or access web sites, or do other fancy stuff that's impossible on DVDs. Where that goes remains to be seen, but it seems to primarily be used to point users to additional content (and, along with it, the change to target ads) online.
The fact that the formats are not compatible with one another is having a negative effect on the growth of the high def disc market. It could be that "universal" players, such as those from LG and Samsung, are the final solution.. but currently, these cost more than getting two basic players.
This format war is really about greed... the company that owns the core technologies for either format will make money on those technology licenses. There may be a winner, but if that happens, the consumers backing the wrong format will likely be the losers, more than any hardware or movie company. However, if the format war lasts long enough to establish low cost universal players, there may simply be no winner, and consumers will largely get to play either format without penalty.
You can argue technical details of one format vs. the other, but these aren't really going to make much difference for regular users -- both formats do pretty much the same thing. Blu-Ray is a bit more advanced, spec-wise, and a bit more powerful. On the other hand, I think the Blu-Ray introduction has tripped up a couple of times, while the HD-DVD rollout was more slick (part of that's the fact that only Toshiba has been selling HD-DVD, and they're all powered by Microsoft's WinCE OS, so there's less variation between players than with the dozen or so companies making Blu-Ray players).
Yes, both are supposed to be better then regular DVD players, and in similar ways. There certainly are technical differences, but the main effective difference to the consumer is that, except for Warner Bros. studios, the major studios are lined up behind one or the other. So if you get HD-DVD, you'll find stuff from WB, Paramount, and NBC/Universal out in HD, and you'll need regular DVDs for other content. If you get Blu-Ray, you'll have Sony, Fox, Disney, etc. but you can't get Paramount or NBC/Universal.
Now, as for better, the "better" is very real. Both formats support full high definition discs (technically, 720/60p, 1080/60i, or 1080/24p), which looks dramatically better on you HDTV than DVD... not that DVDs look all that bad. Both formats support the existing MPEG-2 encoding used on DVDs, but also allow videos to be encoded in two modern compressed formats, MPEG-4 AVC (same format used on the iPod and satellite TV) and VC-1 (that's the standardized version of Windows Media Video 9). The quality on either format can be technically higher than broadcast HDTV, so these are currently about the best looking thing you can view on your HDTV.
They also offer improved sound, with multichannel uncompressed audio (DVDs only offer uncompressed stereo, and even that's rarely offered on DVDs), and surround up to 7.1 channels. Not that many people have 7.1 channel audio today, but these are pretty forward-looking.
The other feature in both is "interactivity"... you can play simple games, or access web sites, or do other fancy stuff that's impossible on DVDs. Where that goes remains to be seen, but it seems to primarily be used to point users to additional content (and, along with it, the change to target ads) online.
The fact that the formats are not compatible with one another is having a negative effect on the growth of the high def disc market. It could be that "universal" players, such as those from LG and Samsung, are the final solution.. but currently, these cost more than getting two basic players.
This format war is really about greed... the company that owns the core technologies for either format will make money on those technology licenses. There may be a winner, but if that happens, the consumers backing the wrong format will likely be the losers, more than any hardware or movie company. However, if the format war lasts long enough to establish low cost universal players, there may simply be no winner, and consumers will largely get to play either format without penalty.
You can argue technical details of one format vs. the other, but these aren't really going to make much difference for regular users -- both formats do pretty much the same thing. Blu-Ray is a bit more advanced, spec-wise, and a bit more powerful. On the other hand, I think the Blu-Ray introduction has tripped up a couple of times, while the HD-DVD rollout was more slick (part of that's the fact that only Toshiba has been selling HD-DVD, and they're all powered by Microsoft's WinCE OS, so there's less variation between players than with the dozen or so companies making Blu-Ray players).
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
