Showing posts with label sony blu ray player $98. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sony blu ray player $98. Show all posts

Monday, March 17, 2014

What do you think? good gaming computer or not?




Fail Dude


http://www.bestbuy.com/site/HP+-+15.6%22+Pavilion+Laptop+-+6GB+Memory+-+640GB+Hard+Drive+-+Dark+Umber/4815065.p?id=1218533331581&skuId=4815065&st=HP%20Pavilion%20dv6-6013cl&cp=1&lp=6


Answer
yeah laptops are bad for gaming. try getting a barebone kit if you're going cheap and just buy a good card for it.
here are some good computers the desktop is used but i own one just like it and it plays mw3 at max settings on a 1080p 32" tv i paid $1500 for mine, the HTPC is if you don't have the room for a desk you can save room by having it on the entertainment center.
gaming htpc llano a8 processor, 500gb seagate momentus hybrid drive, 8gb g.skill sniper ram, sony blu ray player, crossfired 6670, bluetooth, wifi, mini keyboard/mouse combo, 450 WATT 80 PLUS PSU, WINDOWS 7 home premium $1219.98 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007TN5PZ6

gaming computer fx 6100 6 core processor,nzxt tempest 410 gaming case, 2tb western-digital green hard disk drive, xfx radeon hd 6870, 8gb crucial ram, crosair h60 liquid cooling, samsung blu ray drive, 630 WATT 80 PLUS PSU, WINDOWS 7 home premium $1219.98 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007T0DXVM

Should I get a Playstation 3?




Michael W


I have an X-box 360. But I want the Playstation 3 beacuse of Metal Gear Solid 4. I am a big fan of it since it's 1st release on the PS1 back in 98. I'm planning on getting a 40GB before the game comes out. So is it worth spending a 400 system for just one game?


Answer
I also was having this debate not long ago. I have a 360 and I ended up getting a ps3 as well.

For one, I wanted a Blu-Ray player, so right there it was pretty much worth it.

PS3 is a really great system. Don't get me wrong, i don't have a favorite system, but my experience with Sony has always been good. (my ps1 and ps2 are still working great!) And my 360 has been sent in for repairs TWICE already.

Im pretty pumped for Little Big Planet and to try out PSHome

Id say get one, you may not use it as much as your 360 if your not into blu-ray movies so much, but It will come in handy in the long run.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Is it a good deal ??




Bella


I am debating whether to a get a sony BRAVIA 52"1080p lcd hdtv.it is about $1900 and u also get a free sony blue-ray player with it.is it a good deal or should i wait a little to see if the prices will drop further??plz i would appreciate ur response.thanx


Answer
Sony Bravia V-Series KDL-52V4100 52-Inch 1080p LCD HDTV
List Price: $2,199.99
Price: $1,668.00 Free Shipping
You Save: $531.99
reference: http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Bravia-KDL-52V4100-52-Inch-1080p/dp/B0018YNZ68/ref=sr_1_3?tag=commentglitte-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325

and

Sony BDP-S350 1080p Blu-ray Disc Player
Price: $269.98 free shipping
reference: http://www.amazon.com/Sony-BDP-S350-1080p-Blu-ray-Player/dp/B001A4LVYY/ref=sr_1_1?tag=commentglitte-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325

Result: 1,668.00+269.98 = $1937.98

What do you think? good gaming computer or not?




Fail Dude


http://www.bestbuy.com/site/HP+-+15.6%22+Pavilion+Laptop+-+6GB+Memory+-+640GB+Hard+Drive+-+Dark+Umber/4815065.p?id=1218533331581&skuId=4815065&st=HP%20Pavilion%20dv6-6013cl&cp=1&lp=6


Answer
yeah laptops are bad for gaming. try getting a barebone kit if you're going cheap and just buy a good card for it.
here are some good computers the desktop is used but i own one just like it and it plays mw3 at max settings on a 1080p 32" tv i paid $1500 for mine, the HTPC is if you don't have the room for a desk you can save room by having it on the entertainment center.
gaming htpc llano a8 processor, 500gb seagate momentus hybrid drive, 8gb g.skill sniper ram, sony blu ray player, crossfired 6670, bluetooth, wifi, mini keyboard/mouse combo, 450 WATT 80 PLUS PSU, WINDOWS 7 home premium $1219.98 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007TN5PZ6

gaming computer fx 6100 6 core processor,nzxt tempest 410 gaming case, 2tb western-digital green hard disk drive, xfx radeon hd 6870, 8gb crucial ram, crosair h60 liquid cooling, samsung blu ray drive, 630 WATT 80 PLUS PSU, WINDOWS 7 home premium $1219.98 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007T0DXVM




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Tell me your predictions, do you think Blu Ray or HDDVD will come out on top and why?

sony blu ray player $98
 on player with wi fi brand sony $ 98 00 new
sony blu ray player $98 image



Spanglades


I dont want the opinions of obsessed Sony fanboys either so if you fall under this category, dont bother answering.


Answer
I don't believe either will become a standard. A LOT of companies are developing players that will play both BluRay AND HD-DVD...

Both have their advantages and disadvantages, however a decent Blu-ray player is ~$1,000 where an HD-DVD Player can be bought for less than $200 now! Blu-Ray at the time can support a better picture, but only true enthusiests will spend that much money on a player!

98% of the market is people who just want to watch HD for a reasonable price, and most of those people will not even notice the difference in quality!

If I had to guess right now, I'd say HD-DVD will be the most common for now. If and when Blu-Ray comes down in price, it may become the standard however most companies are making their players compatible with both.

It's really too early in the game to tell, especially because no one knows what the standard is going to be and they're afraid to purchase something that they won't be able to use in a few months!!

This reminds me of when Mini-discs were released - it's a great technology! However they were very expensive and the majority of the market ended up buying MP3 players because of price. Unless they were a true enthusiest they weren't too concerned with sound quality, only price...

should i get an xbox 360 or just stick with my current consoles?




tyler d


i own a ps2, a gamecube, and a ds lite. should i get a 360 or just wait for the next xbox?


Answer
Yes, in my opinion you should either get a Xbox 360, or a Playstation 3. If you liked your PS2 a lot, than definitely get a PS3. It has stayed close to home, with many welcomed features such as Blue-Ray, and the new Six axis controller. Whatever you get, a Ps3, or 360, you will definitely be surprised at how much gaming has changed over the past 2-4 years. A PS2, as of right now is considered and older system, and a Gamecube is just considered out of date. Here is a comparison that might make the choice a bit easier, (don't let the $400 price tag of the PS3 baffle you. In April there will be a $100 price reduction, and also it has lots of built in features that you would have to pay close to $300 more. Like a Blue-Ray player would be about $300-500 if you bought it alone). GET A PS3!!! but a Xbox 360 is a respectable console, non the less...

For One, the PS3 will last the longest for the next gen consoles that are out now:

Xbox 360 was made in 2005, they've already made a different version of it (Elite) so soon they'll have the next 360, more likely the 720, probably in 2010-2012 that's not very long 1-3 years of play
Wii- was poorly designed in 2006. They'll have to make the Wii 2 sometime soon, probably 2010-2012 as well.
Playstation 3- was made in the same year as the Wii, 2006. Sony designed it though to last for 10 years! Meaning it will still be around and popular in 2016.

The PS3 amazing. It has better reliability, can be turned into a PC and download Windows XP or Vista, or for free download Linux. For everything that it has, it is much cheaper then the Xbox 360, consider the following.
With the PS3, you get:
-A Blue-Ray player, and one of the best ones out so far. It is also considered new technology. If you don't have Blue-Ray players to start out with when buying the PS3, it also has a DVD upconverter, meaning that you can play normal DVD's with better quality picture.
-The PS3 also features PSN( the (P)lay(S)tation (N)etwork). It's free to use, and download demo's such as Warhawk, and Home. Unlike Xbox Live, it doesn't cost $80 for the first year bundle, and $50 for each following year.
-The PS3 has exlusives like no other console, like Resistance 2, LittleBig Planet, Motorstorm: Pacific Rift, Metal Gear Solid 4 and in the future: inFamous, Killzone 2, God of War 3, Uncharted 2, L.A. Noire, Heavy Rain and Massive Action Game (M.A.G.âin which over 256 players will be able to play on the same map at the same time)
-For the money, you get 80GB of space, and only 60GB on the Xbox 360, USB mini drives can also be used from the 2.0 USB ports in the front of the PS3. It also has an easily removable HDD.
-Built in, superior Wi-Fi
-Web browser, just like a PC's

On the Xbox 360's you get a 1 in 3 failure rate. Even though Microsoft knows of this problem, they don't even think about the red rings of death while shipping it out to unsuspecting customers

So hereâs a quick run-down of what you must buy with the PS3 and 360:

PS3:
Console(there will be a $100 decrease in April 2009) $300
Game $60
Controller $55
Total: $415

Really, if you bought all the things the PS3 offers SEPERATELY, you would be able to buy roughly 3 PS3's with that money (gaming console+computer+SUPERB Blu Ray player)

Xbox 360:
Console $300
Game $60
Controller $60
Xbox Live $80
Wi-Fi $100
Total: $660

As you can see, the PS3 is cheaper by far and plus, The multi-platform games are using about 25% of the PS3's graphical potential. So that means much better graphics in the future when they can get a grip on the PS3's power.

On the other hand, most multiplatform games are using about 98% of the 360âs potential. And they look about the same. At this rate in 1 year, the PS3 will have outshone the 360 graphic wise. Itâs just that the 8-core Cell Broadband Processor is very complex, and takes developers time to get used to. And they are getting the hang of things. The PS3 has a very good reliability rate: only 0.2% failure rate (note the decimal), while Xbox 360's have a 30% failure rate. So, for every 1000 of both consoles produced, 2 PS3's are defective, whilst about 330 Xbox 360's are defective. The numbers speak for themselves. Many game developers have OPENLY stated that in the near future, and right now, they will use the PS3 as a lead-developing platform, and then they will port the games to the 360.

So pretty much, the PS3 wins hands down. It's the best system people have seen yet! The PS3 will also progress in the future, like it's downgraded because it was so good that other people couldn't afford it. So anyways hope I helped!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Tell me your predictions, do you think Blu Ray or HDDVD will come out on top and why?

sony blu ray player $98
 on Polaroid PDM-0743 7 in. Portable DVD Player - Blu-ray and DVD Players ...
sony blu ray player $98 image



Spanglades


I dont want the opinions of obsessed Sony fanboys either so if you fall under this category, dont bother answering.


Answer
I don't believe either will become a standard. A LOT of companies are developing players that will play both BluRay AND HD-DVD...

Both have their advantages and disadvantages, however a decent Blu-ray player is ~$1,000 where an HD-DVD Player can be bought for less than $200 now! Blu-Ray at the time can support a better picture, but only true enthusiests will spend that much money on a player!

98% of the market is people who just want to watch HD for a reasonable price, and most of those people will not even notice the difference in quality!

If I had to guess right now, I'd say HD-DVD will be the most common for now. If and when Blu-Ray comes down in price, it may become the standard however most companies are making their players compatible with both.

It's really too early in the game to tell, especially because no one knows what the standard is going to be and they're afraid to purchase something that they won't be able to use in a few months!!

This reminds me of when Mini-discs were released - it's a great technology! However they were very expensive and the majority of the market ended up buying MP3 players because of price. Unless they were a true enthusiest they weren't too concerned with sound quality, only price...

should i get an xbox 360 or just stick with my current consoles?




tyler d


i own a ps2, a gamecube, and a ds lite. should i get a 360 or just wait for the next xbox?


Answer
Yes, in my opinion you should either get a Xbox 360, or a Playstation 3. If you liked your PS2 a lot, than definitely get a PS3. It has stayed close to home, with many welcomed features such as Blue-Ray, and the new Six axis controller. Whatever you get, a Ps3, or 360, you will definitely be surprised at how much gaming has changed over the past 2-4 years. A PS2, as of right now is considered and older system, and a Gamecube is just considered out of date. Here is a comparison that might make the choice a bit easier, (don't let the $400 price tag of the PS3 baffle you. In April there will be a $100 price reduction, and also it has lots of built in features that you would have to pay close to $300 more. Like a Blue-Ray player would be about $300-500 if you bought it alone). GET A PS3!!! but a Xbox 360 is a respectable console, non the less...

For One, the PS3 will last the longest for the next gen consoles that are out now:

Xbox 360 was made in 2005, they've already made a different version of it (Elite) so soon they'll have the next 360, more likely the 720, probably in 2010-2012 that's not very long 1-3 years of play
Wii- was poorly designed in 2006. They'll have to make the Wii 2 sometime soon, probably 2010-2012 as well.
Playstation 3- was made in the same year as the Wii, 2006. Sony designed it though to last for 10 years! Meaning it will still be around and popular in 2016.

The PS3 amazing. It has better reliability, can be turned into a PC and download Windows XP or Vista, or for free download Linux. For everything that it has, it is much cheaper then the Xbox 360, consider the following.
With the PS3, you get:
-A Blue-Ray player, and one of the best ones out so far. It is also considered new technology. If you don't have Blue-Ray players to start out with when buying the PS3, it also has a DVD upconverter, meaning that you can play normal DVD's with better quality picture.
-The PS3 also features PSN( the (P)lay(S)tation (N)etwork). It's free to use, and download demo's such as Warhawk, and Home. Unlike Xbox Live, it doesn't cost $80 for the first year bundle, and $50 for each following year.
-The PS3 has exlusives like no other console, like Resistance 2, LittleBig Planet, Motorstorm: Pacific Rift, Metal Gear Solid 4 and in the future: inFamous, Killzone 2, God of War 3, Uncharted 2, L.A. Noire, Heavy Rain and Massive Action Game (M.A.G.âin which over 256 players will be able to play on the same map at the same time)
-For the money, you get 80GB of space, and only 60GB on the Xbox 360, USB mini drives can also be used from the 2.0 USB ports in the front of the PS3. It also has an easily removable HDD.
-Built in, superior Wi-Fi
-Web browser, just like a PC's

On the Xbox 360's you get a 1 in 3 failure rate. Even though Microsoft knows of this problem, they don't even think about the red rings of death while shipping it out to unsuspecting customers

So hereâs a quick run-down of what you must buy with the PS3 and 360:

PS3:
Console(there will be a $100 decrease in April 2009) $300
Game $60
Controller $55
Total: $415

Really, if you bought all the things the PS3 offers SEPERATELY, you would be able to buy roughly 3 PS3's with that money (gaming console+computer+SUPERB Blu Ray player)

Xbox 360:
Console $300
Game $60
Controller $60
Xbox Live $80
Wi-Fi $100
Total: $660

As you can see, the PS3 is cheaper by far and plus, The multi-platform games are using about 25% of the PS3's graphical potential. So that means much better graphics in the future when they can get a grip on the PS3's power.

On the other hand, most multiplatform games are using about 98% of the 360âs potential. And they look about the same. At this rate in 1 year, the PS3 will have outshone the 360 graphic wise. Itâs just that the 8-core Cell Broadband Processor is very complex, and takes developers time to get used to. And they are getting the hang of things. The PS3 has a very good reliability rate: only 0.2% failure rate (note the decimal), while Xbox 360's have a 30% failure rate. So, for every 1000 of both consoles produced, 2 PS3's are defective, whilst about 330 Xbox 360's are defective. The numbers speak for themselves. Many game developers have OPENLY stated that in the near future, and right now, they will use the PS3 as a lead-developing platform, and then they will port the games to the 360.

So pretty much, the PS3 wins hands down. It's the best system people have seen yet! The PS3 will also progress in the future, like it's downgraded because it was so good that other people couldn't afford it. So anyways hope I helped!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Saturday, July 13, 2013

What should i get a Xbox 360 or Ps3?

sony blu ray player $98
 on Meanwhile, the Blu-ray spec continued to be a work in progress as Sony ...
sony blu ray player $98 image



crazy dude


I was wondering I want to get either the ps3 or the XBox 360 and I want to know which ones better.


Answer
The PS3 is the obvious choice here. In short, it has better reliability, multimedia capabilities, a large list of exclusives and more coming out in 2009 and in the future, it will have over-the-top graphical capabilities (google âHeavy Rainâ). And to those who say the Xbox 360 is cheaper, well then just look at the following list:

With the PS3, you get:
-A Blu-Ray player, which if you wanted one of equal value would blow at least a $700 hole in your wallet, plus a mean DVD-upconverter
-Free online service, the Playstation Network, which is only a few steps behind Xbox Live these days
-An ever-growing list of exclusives, like Resistance 2, LittleBig Planet, Motorstorm: Pacific Rift, Metal Gear Solid 4 and in the future: inFamous, Killzone 2, God of War 3, Uncharted 2, L.A. Noire, Heavy Rain and Massive Action Game (M.A.G.âin which over 256 players will be able to play on the same map at the same time)
-More flexible in terms of hardware, e.g. swappable HDD, USB mini cable, etc.
-Built in, superior Wi-Fi
-Web browser
-A super sleek system complete with chrome trim and a slot loading disc drive

With the Xbox 360, you get:
-DVD Player/upconverter
-Xbox live, which is $60/year, and not even worth it
-Halo 3 and Gears of War 2 (thatâs a lot of exclusives compared to the PS3, if you ask me: P)
-Ummâ¦canât really say anything about non-proprietaryness, because Microsoft inflates the prices for their accessories.
-A 1 in 3 failure rate (it's not "if", it's "when")
-Many people are on their 5th or 6th 360's already because of RROD, and my friend is on his 11th!

So hereâs a quick run-down of what you must buy with the PS3 and 360:

PS3:
Console $400
Game $60
Controller $55
Charger $2-10--any USB mini cable will do
Total: $517

Really, if you bought all the things the PS3 offers SEPERATELY, you would be able to buy roughly 3 PS3's with that money.

Xbox 360:
Console $300
Game $60
Controller $60
Play and Charge kit x2 $60
Xbox Live $60
Wi-Fi $100
Total: $640

Thatâs not cheaper, so get a grip on it! Sony said that they made the PS3 to last a decade. The multi-platform games are using about 25% of the PS3's graphical potential. So there's lots of wiggle room in the future for much more brighter, detailed and massive environments.

On the other hand, most multiplatform games are using about 98% of the 360âs potential. And they look about the same. At this rate in 1 year, the PS3 will have outshone the 360 graphic wise. Itâs just that the 8-core Cell Broadband Processor is very complex, and takes developers time to get used to. And they are getting the hang of things. The PS3 has a very good reliability rate: only 0.2% failure rate (note the decimal), while Xbox 360's have a 30% failure rate. So, for every 1000 of both consoles produced, 2 PS3's are defective, whilst about 330 Xbox 360's are defective. The numbers speak for themselves. Many game developers have OPENLY stated that in the near future, and right now, they will use the PS3 as a lead-developing platform, and then they will port the games to the 360.

Also, many Xbox fanboys will say "Sure, LIVE is 60 bucks a year, but you get what you pay for." Isn't this like a Sony fanboy saying "Sure, PS3 is a 100 bucks more, but that is *pretty much* all you pay for?

So in conclusion, the PS3 is betterâyou get the most bang for your buck, and it's an incredibly advanced all-in-one home media center hub. You can even install Linux or Windows XP and use it as a computer-legally! While with the Xbox 360, Microsoft will ban your 360 from certain things, if you install the OS at all (just try to bypass the security).

Hope this helps!

Okay, could tell me what should I get; PS3 or a 360*?







I have the money and everything. Im thinking to buy a PS3 with MGS4, Uncharted, & C of D 5. I have 500$ and I do not care if I spend it all. But im debating because the 360* has better online. What would you choose in the situation?


Answer
NOTE: Skip ahead to the *** if you aren't interested in reading an essay lol and just want to see the comparison of PSN VS LIVE (3rd paragraph from the bottom)

Why you should get a PS3 and NOT a Xbox 360

The *expected* lifetimes of current home video game consoles:

Xbox 360--2005-2010, you'll get 1 and a half years out of it
Wii-2006-2010, you'll get 1 and a half years out of it
Playstation 3-2015 (Sony said they made it to last 10 years, so 2006+10 years=2016, round it down just to be safe), you'll get 7 years out of it.

In short, it has better reliability, multimedia capabilities, a large list of exclusives and more coming out in 2009 and in the future and it has over-the-top graphical capabilities (google âHeavy Rainâ). And to those who say the Xbox 360 is cheaper, well then just look at the following list:

With the PS3, you get:
-A Blu-Ray player, which if you wanted one of equal value would blow at least a $700 hole in your wallet
-Free online service
-An ever-growing list of exclusives, like Resistance 2, LittleBig Planet, Motorstorm: Pacific Rift, Metal Gear Solid 4 and in the future: inFamous, Killzone 2, God of War 3, Uncharted 2, L.A. Noire, Heavy Rain and Massive Action Game (M.A.G.âin which over 256 players will be able to play on the same map at the same time, 128 VS 128)
-More flexible in terms of hardware, e.g. swappable HDD, USB mini cable, etc.
-Built in, superior Wi-Fi
-Web browser
-A super sleek system complete with chrome trim and a slot loading disc drive
-HDMI 1.3, Xbox 360 only has HDMI 1.2 (major difference despite only a 0.1 difference)

With the Xbox 360, you get:
-DVD Player/upconverter
-Xbox live, which is $50/year, and not even worth it
-Halo 3 and Gears of War 2 (thatâs a lot of exclusives compared to the PS3, if you ask me: P)
-Ummâ¦canât really say anything about non-proprietaryness, because Microsoft inflates the prices for their accessories. 120GB for $150? With the PS3, you can upgrade to 500GB for $110!
-A 1 in 3 failure rate (it's not "if", it's "when")
-Many people are on their 5th or 6th 360's already because of RROD, and my friend is on his 12th!

So hereâs a quick run-down of what you must buy with the PS3 and 360:

PS3:
Console $400
Game $60
Controller $55
Charger $2-10--any USB mini cable will do
Total: $517 ($2 USB mini cable)

Really, if you bought all the things the PS3 offers SEPERATELY, you would be able to buy roughly 3 PS3's with that money (gaming console+computer+SUPERB Blu Ray player)

Xbox 360:
Console $300
Game $60
Controller $60
Play and Charge kit x2 $60 (for 2 controllers)
Xbox Live $60
Wi-Fi $100
Total: $640

Thatâs not cheaper, so get a grip on it! The multi-platform games are using about 25% of the PS3's graphical potential. So there's lots of wiggle room in the future for much more brighter, detailed and massive environments.

On the other hand, most multiplatform games are using about 98% of the 360âs potential. And they look the same, if not better on the PS3. At this rate in 1 year, the PS3 will have outshone the 360 graphic wise. Itâs just that the 8-core Cell Broadband Processor is very complex, and takes developers time to get used to. And they are getting the hang of things. The PS3 has a very good reliability rate: only 0.2% failure rate (note the decimal), while Xbox 360's have a 30% failure rate. So, for every 1000 of both consoles produced, 2 PS3's are defective, whilst about 330 Xbox 360's are defective. The numbers speak for themselves. Many game developers have OPENLY stated that in the near future, and right now, they will use the PS3 as a lead-developing platform, and then they will port the games to the 360.

***Xbox Live VS PSN? The only thing you are missing is cross voice chat, which can easily be solved by using a telephone, or even in PSNâs V3.00 update, which we will be seeing soon enough.***

The PS3 has sold 21 million units in 2 years. The Xbox 360 has sold 28 million in 3 years. Plus a 33% failure rate, that means that 9.24 million units are either refurbished ones or replacements. So really, the amount of one-time buyers is about 19 million. So really, the PS3 has sold 21 million in 2 years, while the Xbox 360 has sold 19 in 3 years, and the PS3 has a higher face value ($199.99 vs. $399.99)

So in conclusion, the PS3 is betterâyou get the most bang for your buck, and it's an incredibly advanced all-in-one home media center hub. You can even install Linux or Windows XP and use it as a computerâlegally! While with the Xbox 360, Microsoft will ban your 360 from certain things, if you install the OS at all (just try to bypass the security).

Hope this helps!

Source(s):
--PS3 expert--




Powered by Yahoo! Answers